I already mentioned my confusion on this in IRC so +1 for me on the change.
Don't forget to update: http://www.uportal.org/cvs.html On Feb 4, 2008 1:22 PM, Eric Dalquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is true, an svn switch should work though I don't have any real > experience using the svn switch command so I can't say how exactly that > works :) > > > Jen Bourey wrote: > > +1 for renaming. > > Wouldn't it be possible for people to do an svn switch rather than a fresh > checkout if they so desired? > > - Jen > > > On Feb 4, 2008 2:52 PM, Eric Dalquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So way back when uPortal 2 and uPortal 3 were separate code bases we > > moved from CVS to SVN. As part of this move I had the brilliant idea to > > include a version number in the name of the SVN path for uPortal 2.X > > (up2) and uPortal 3.X (up3). With the very smart change in direction we > > made in the last year /up3 has been moved to /sandbox/portal but /up2 > > remains. As we get closer to a 3.0.0-GA release this may be an issue we > > want to address. > > > > I would like to get peoples feelings on renaming /up2 to /uPortal. I > > believe that if we did this everyone that currently has /up2 checked out > > would need to do a new check out of /uPortal. Is the 2 in the path > > something we need to worry about? > > > > -Eric > > > > -- > You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see > http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev > > -- You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
