+1 for the name change.
drew wills
Cris J Holdorph wrote:
I think the naming change to the subversion repository is both necessary
and required if we're really going to call the next release version 3.0.
So, +1 from me, despite any challenges it might bring.
---- Cris J H
Eric Dalquist wrote:
So way back when uPortal 2 and uPortal 3 were separate code bases we
moved from CVS to SVN. As part of this move I had the brilliant idea
to include a version number in the name of the SVN path for uPortal
2.X (up2) and uPortal 3.X (up3). With the very smart change in
direction we made in the last year /up3 has been moved to
/sandbox/portal but /up2 remains. As we get closer to a 3.0.0-GA
release this may be an issue we want to address.
I would like to get peoples feelings on renaming /up2 to /uPortal. I
believe that if we did this everyone that currently has /up2 checked
out would need to do a new check out of /uPortal. Is the 2 in the path
something we need to worry about?
-Eric
--
Andrew Wills
UNICON, Inc.
Office: (480) 558-2476
http://code.google.com/p/cernunnos/
--
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
