Something else I thought of if it helps is that Sourceforge, Apache 
(although it was several years ago and my patch was integrated by 
someone else), and Atlassian community projects that I've contributed to 
have not required actual hand-signed statements/contracts (that I 
remember at least- RPI was the only one that required a signed agreement 
for Bedework iirc).

Couldn't there just be an online form to submit a request for access to 
contribute that doesn't require printing/signing/faxing or mailing? I'm 
pretty sure that I had to agree to something when signing up with 
sourceforge. Then whenever changes came about, they've just sent an 
email to state the changes to the agreement (and maybe how to contact 
them or opt-out if they disagree) iirc.

License changes for uPortal and other top-level JASIG projects could 
then just be handled by an email out to the group stating that 
everything under the JASIG umbrella in the code had a proposed license 
change and it could be voted on like any other changes.

Thanks!
Gary


Gary Weaver wrote:
> Curious- will this also apply to all portlets contributed to sandbox?
>
> How feasible is all of this if there is some code here and there (not 
> sure if there is, but if there is) that was contributed under a 
> different license?
>
> In open source projects before, I've never been asked to change the 
> license by the person hosting the source control repository (it has 
> usually just been an initiative by the developers on the project 
> itself), so am just curious.
>
> Thanks!
> Gary
>
>
> Jason Shao (CampusEAI Consortium) wrote:
>   
>> Uh oh ­ the board really wanted to validate everyone was comfortable signing
>> the forms before voting to finalize them...
>>
>> If (DecisionMaking.repeatsAdInfinitum()) {break;}
>>
>> *whew* that was close ;)
>>
>> Not to steal John L.¹s thunder ­- but I'd like to publicly commend him --
>> he's done an excellent, enormous (and thankless) job putting these items
>> together. I know he and the rest of the board are very interested in making
>> sure we¹ve got the right balance between protecting everyone (developers,
>> institutions, Jasig) and not being too onerous. Hopefully when everyone
>> looks at the proposed documents  if there are any comments (cynical or
>> otherwise) I think we¹d all love to hear them.
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> On 7/28/09 6:35 PM, "Cris Holdorph" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> I'm waiting for the licensing policy to be officially voted on and
>>> approved by the board, before signing it.  Call me a cynic or lazy, but
>>> I hate having to sign forms, then turn around and sign it again, because
>>> they changed one sentence.
>>>
>>> ---- Cris J H
>>>
>>> Eric Dalquist wrote:
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> As an FYI for uPortal developers and those interested in uPortal
>>>> development. The Jasig board has been working on updating the licensing
>>>> policy for projects under its purview. The updated policy is available
>>>> for public review on the wiki: http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/x/6YB9AQ
>>>>
>>>> I just wanted to let everyone know that I'm looking forward to these
>>>> changes and will be sending in my own signed Contributer License
>>>> Agreement (CLA) shortly. While I believe direct contact with existing
>>>> uPortal developers is planned I would encourage anyone with commit
>>>> access to the Jasig SVN repository to go ahead and submit a signed CLA
>>>> as well after of course going through whatever institutional policy you
>>>> need to for that. Your initiative in this effort will help make the
>>>> transition go as smoothly as possible.
>>>>
>>>> If you have comments or questions about the licensing policy updates you
>>>> can continue the discussion here or email [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Eric Dalquist
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> --
>>> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as:
>>> [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>>> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>> --
>> Jason Shao
>> Director of Product Development
>> CampusEAI Consortium
>> 1940 East 6th Street, 11th Floor
>> Cleveland, OH 44114
>> Tel: 216.589.9626x249
>> Fax: 216.589.9639
>>
>>
>> Your input is important to improve upon our continuous efforts to service 
>> you better. Please e-mail my manager at [email protected] with any 
>> feedback.
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
>> This e-mail together with any attachments is proprietary and confidential; 
>> intended for only the recipient(s) named above and may contain information 
>> that is privileged. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any 
>> attachments for any purpose, or disclose all or any part of the contents to 
>> any person. Any views or opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the 
>> author and do not represent those of CampusEAI Consortium or the Open 
>> Student Television Network. If you have received this e-mail in error, or 
>> are not the named recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any review, 
>> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited 
>> by the sender and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic 
>> Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510-2521. Please immediately 
>> notify the sender and delete this e-mail and any attachments from your 
>> computer. Warning: Although precautions have been taken to make sure no 
>> viruses are present in this e-mail, the companies cannot accept 
>> responsibility for any loss or damage that arise from the use of this e-mail 
>> or attachments.
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>
>
>   



-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev

Reply via email to