Probably would be a better thing for the portal to signal to the 
portlets the mobile-ness of the user agent rather than duplicate that 
configuration out into the portlets. :)
JNW>  True. Good point.

James Wennmacher - Unicon
480.558.2420

On 11/04/2014 10:28 AM, Andrew Petro wrote:
> JW> have the same string applied to the mUniversality agent selector 
> in the bundled portlets which would be a good thing
>
> Probably would be a better thing for the portal to signal to the 
> portlets the mobile-ness of the user agent rather than duplicate that 
> configuration out into the portlets. :)
>
> Backlogged https://issues.jasig.org/browse/UP-4284 to tease this out 
> of pom.xml and authoritatively into portal.properties.
>
> Andrew
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:23 AM, James Wennmacher 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     I think it allows maven filtering into PAGSGroupStoreConfig.xml
>     (and of course into portal.properties) to have a single
>     definition, though the regex tester could be replaced with a
>     specialized class to remove it from the xml file. Looks like it is
>     also in userContext.xml though that one can use the
>     portal.properties value instead of maven filtering.  The value in
>     portal.properties is derived from the value in the pom.xml so I'm
>     not sure what you mean when you say you tripped over it.  As far
>     as I can tell right now there is only one definition (in pom.xml).
>
>     As an aside being in the pom.xml I think it could allow, using
>     maven overlays, to have the same string applied to the
>     mUniversality agent selector in the bundled portlets which would
>     be a good thing, though it does not as of this moment.
>
>     James Wennmacher - Unicon
>     480.558.2420 <tel:480.558.2420>
>
>
>     On 11/04/2014 07:05 AM, Andrew Petro wrote:
>
>         Hi,
>
>         Anyone remember why
>
>         <mobile.user.agent.regex>(.*iPhone.*)...</mobile.user.agent.regex>
>
>         ( source code line: http://goo.gl/gtL8kA )
>
>         is in pom.xml instead of in portal.properties?
>
>         Tripped over this just now and looking to proffer a PR
>         offering a breadcrumb to the next poor fellow to trip over it.
>
>         Andrew
>
>         -- 
>
>         You are currently subscribed to [email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]> as:
>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>         To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>         http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     You are currently subscribed to [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]> as: [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see
>     http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev
>
>
> -- 
>
> You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
> http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev


-- 
You are currently subscribed to [email protected] as: 
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see 
http://www.ja-sig.org/wiki/display/JSG/uportal-dev

Reply via email to