On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 09:11 +0200, Kees Jongenburger wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Scott James Remnant <sc...@netsplit.com> > wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 22:20 +0200, Kees Jongenburger wrote: > >> > Hardly "did not get any feed-back" > >> and True again. Call it a compatibility problem the report was /is an > >> official way of stating that problem. and there is no response. > >> > > What kind of a response are you expecting? > > Thanks for the report. "This is a known issue" or "we where not aware > of this issue". The problem > is caused by the event driven nature of the system. "To resolve this > issue we need to create a in memory > structure that describes the dependencies" or "We don't know yet how > to fix this issue". > You had exactly this response. Frankly, I don't know what you're complaining about!
> My goal is not to bash and I am willing to put some effort (as I did) > in fixing such issue but I need at least > some guidance into how you want it fixed. > How I want it fixed? You're the one who wants it fixed ;) Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- upstart-devel mailing list upstart-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/upstart-devel
