On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 18:24 +0200, Kees Jongenburger wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Scott James Remnant <sc...@netsplit.com> > wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 09:11 +0200, Kees Jongenburger wrote: > > > >> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Scott James Remnant <sc...@netsplit.com> > >> wrote: > >> > On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 22:20 +0200, Kees Jongenburger wrote: > >> >> > Hardly "did not get any feed-back" > >> >> and True again. Call it a compatibility problem the report was /is an > >> >> official way of stating that problem. and there is no response. > >> >> > >> > What kind of a response are you expecting? > >> > >> Thanks for the report. "This is a known issue" or "we where not aware > >> of this issue". The problem > >> is caused by the event driven nature of the system. "To resolve this > >> issue we need to create a in memory > >> structure that describes the dependencies" or "We don't know yet how > >> to fix this issue". > >> > > You had exactly this response. Frankly, I don't know what you're > > complaining about! > > No it's not clear if you want those issues to be addressed in the next > generation. > I said pretty much exactly this on IRC, just that I had no idea how to solve it just yet. Mutually exclusive services aren't in the current design of Upstart, and nobody's proposed a better one yet.
> Going back to the original subject of the thread and as all the code is yours. > Will you accept fixes in 0.5.x or should be not bother you with these problems > and find other solutions? > Yes, I'll accept bug fixes for 0.5.x and new development work for trunk. I've mailed you a copyright assignment form. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- upstart-devel mailing list upstart-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/upstart-devel
