after all the work to standardize coding styles in urjtag, i dont think a document was put together to codify it all. or did i just miss it ?
i tried looking through the history, but couldnt find any reference to struct
initializer style. the current style is a pita when updating the struct
definition as it requires updating every struct initializer instance in the
whole tree.
to be clear, i'd prefer we not use this form:
... = {
a, b, c, d
};
but instead use the clearer form:
... = {
.foo = a,
.bar = b,
...
};
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
