hi, > after all the work to standardize coding styles in urjtag, i dont think a > document was put together to codify it all. or did i just miss it ?
there's only the old http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/urjtag/index.php?title=Development > but instead use the clearer form: > ... = { > .foo = a, i definitely agree with that! kolja -- mr. kolja waschk - haubach-39 - 22765 hh - germany fon +49 40 889130-34 - fax -35 - http://www.ixo.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
