Waschk,Kolja wrote: > hi, > >> after all the work to standardize coding styles in urjtag, i dont think a >> document was put together to codify it all. or did i just miss it ? > > there's only the old > http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/urjtag/index.php?title=Development > >> but instead use the clearer form: >> ... = { >> .foo = a, > > i definitely agree with that! > > kolja
Me too (back from holidays) Rutger ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
