On 11/05/15 09:20, Geoff Canyon wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Mark Schonewille <
m.schonewi...@economy-x-talk.com> wrote:
Software should be unicode-compatible nowadays. This is what users and
developers expect. So, I would say 100%.
I think of myself as a developer. Everything I do these days is in-house,
and has absolutely no need of unicode. The most recent thing I worked on
for others is Navigator, and no one has ever asked me for a unicode version
of that. The last app I worked on before that has been selling for the past
12 years or so, internationally, and no one has asked for a unicode version
of that. Maybe I'm unique, but for my personal use cases, unicode is
irrelevant, and given the opportunity costs and performance hits, a
negative.
_______________________________________________
This is why LiveCode needs to be modularized, so one can opt-in or not
as the case may
be for what capabilities you require when it comes to hiving off a
standalone.
Richmond.
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
