> On 22 Sep 2016, at 8:03 AM, Richard Gaskin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Either way, seems worth exploring, either refining the behavior of the > token's documentation.
I personally don’t see any harm in throwing a general merge evaluation error and it would be relatively easy to implement. It would be significantly more difficult to be specific about what the error was caused by or in your example throw the error on the line in the foo function. Cheers Monte _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
