BNig wrote:
> Scott Rossi wrote
>> It's wrong but it's always been like this.  LC doesn't like graphics
>> smaller than 9 pixels.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Scott Rossi
>
> that is determined somewhat arbitrarily by the revBackScriptLibrary in
> handler
>
> on newGraphic
>  if the width of the target < 9 and the height of the target < 9 then
>    .... use default values
>
> if you set those values to "<8" then it lets you clone a 8 by 8
> graphic.

Would that be a user experience bug?

What would be a good reason to prevent the user from doing a reasonable action like this?

If the size is explicitly set, why not let it remain so?

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Systems
 Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
 ____________________________________________________________________
 ambassa...@fourthworld.com                http://www.FourthWorld.com

_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to