Jeanne A. E. DeVoto wrote: > At 3:02 AM -0800 12/2/2016, BNig wrote: >> It seems the consensus is to lower the threshold when graphics are >> changed to default sizes. I will do an enhancement request next week >> and propose that the currrent threshold of 8 by 8 and lower will be >> reduced to 5 by 5 and lower. > > Is there any reason not to check the tool, instead of playing with > the size threshold? > > If the tool is not any of the graphic tools, then the user was not > manually creating the object: it must have been created via script > and there's no issue of accidental clicks, so the IDE should not > override the size. If the tool is a graphic tool, then the user > manually created the object and so it's reasonable to apply a size > floor.
I believe the original post here was about cloning, presumably done via Option+drag (on macOS, or Cntrl+drag on Win and Linux).
But another case might be scripted creation of objects that use drag rather than the create command.
So many possibilities that I wouldn't be opposed to completely removing arbitrary IDE-imposed limits on what people can do with their objects.
-- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Systems Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web ____________________________________________________________________ ambassa...@fourthworld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
