Cheers back dear Sarah,
I couldn't agree with you more. Not knowing what direction Apple may
take at any point in time would make developing without some sort of
pre-approval; or, at least, approval of concept a most hazardous
venture. On the other hand, I can see that many developers would find
this sort of revelation even more dangerous; particularly if they feel
what they are proposing to do is most "revolutionary". (smile) After
all, there are leaks everywhere and lead-time can be important in the
developmental process.
Just MHO,
Joe Wilkins
On Oct 10, 2008, at 8:22 PM, Sarah Reichelt wrote:
As I read Gruber's article, his main point is that the policy is
wrong, not that the pulled app was in contravention of the current
agreement. However I do think a pre-approval mechanism would be
beneficial.
And please don't apologize for disagreeing with me. If we can't have a
reasonable & courteous debate on this list, then I would be very sorry
:-)
Cheers,
Sara
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
