Sorry, but I am part of the revolution (if, admittedly, only the
boy who throws eggs at the Tsar) as I am signed, and paid-up for the
conference, and so, in line to receive "4"; meanwhile, tootling around
with 2.6.1 I am, of necessity, confined to the old revOnline.
Of course, anybody who stopped a minute and thought, would
have kept old versions of RR for "magical moments" such as these.
I have RR 1 - 2.0.1 tucked away for various reasons; and from time
to time they all prove useful.
Kay C Lan wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Richmond Mathewson <
[email protected]> wrote:
So, the proable reason no one found my "QUESTION.rev" stack is that nobody
wanted to type a taboo name. :)
I believe the real reason is that you uploaded your stack to the OLD
RevOnline whilst those that did the searching did it on the NEW RevOnline.
Not only has the RevOnline interface been vastly updated in 3.5 but my
understanding is that the whole back-end is new too. Nothing on the OLD
RevOnline exists on the NEW RevOnline unless individuals have intentionally
uploaded their old content using Rev 3.5 to get it onto the NEW RevOnline.
Rev 3.5 can't upload or look into the OLD RevOnline and Rev 3.0 or earlier
can't upload or look into the NEW RevOnline.
I may be wrong, but it's what you get for being part of the revolution ;-)
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
