Wouldn't it make even more sense to have a prominent link on the New
RevOnLine to the Old RevOnLine? And vice versa? But that's too obvious!
Joe Wilkins
On May 9, 2009, at 7:31 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Richmond Mathewson <
[email protected]> wrote:
Of course, anybody who stopped a minute and thought, would
have kept old versions of RR for "magical moments" such as these.
Which of course is a lot less time than what is wasted looking for a
stack
in the wrong RevOnline. I can't keep up with what OS most List
members are
on much less which version of Rev they might be using. Others on
this List
will undoubtedly have much better memories than I, but it may be
just easier
for anyone announcing that they've uploaded something to RevOnline
to kindly
include whether it's to OLD RevOnline or NEW RevOnline, that way we
can
crank up the old version of Rev if necessary rather than waste time
in the
wrong RevOnline or incorrectly concluding that the NEW RevOnline
still has a
few wrinkles to iron out.
Just a thought.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
