So perhaps, on further reflection, we just need some sort of "caveat"
dialog on the two sites, that let users know this problem exists when
they can't find that for which they're searching. Would save the list
having to "re-explain" this condition ad nauseam. I'm always looking
for simplistic solutions. Simple people do that! (smile)
Joe Wilkins
On May 9, 2009, at 9:32 AM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
Wouldn't it make even more sense to have a prominent link on the
New RevOnLine to the Old RevOnLine? And vice versa? But that's too
obvious!
It can't be done. The two systems use different back-end databases,
different log-ins, and a completely rewritten RevOnline stack with
different code. People using older copies of Rev can't access the
new database, and vice versa.
Those who have both older and newer copies of Rev could upload twice
if they are in a sharing mood. That's about the only way to do it.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [email protected]
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
