In addition to syllables, the system should be able to identify the following textual chunks: Characters Phonems Words Parts of speech (phrases) subject/object Semantic roots Sentences Paragraphs Sections Volumes Sets Lists Multidimentional arrays and nested tables Unlimited nested and overlapping hyperlinks and transclussions Tempo, pausing, pitch, volume, and percussive contrast Ontological association network mapping between any chunk or chunk type
A simple, intuitive and robust interface and functional library to address and effect these objects at every hierarchy of the grammatical stack. randall -----Original Message----- From: Randall Reetz <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 12:49 PM To: How to use Revolution <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Syllabic division of words This should be a standard function in any xtalk environment. Computing, like any system is a dance between things and actions brought upon those things. Nouns must be identified and parameterized before verbs can act on them. Text is the abstraction we use to do this mapping. If the computer can't fluidly address the chunking that makes up every level of the grammatical hierarchy within our language, the things we can do with this tool are vastly restricted. randall -----Original Message----- From: Richmond Mathewson <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:16 AM To: How to use Revolution <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Syllabic division of words Francis Nugent Dixon wrote: > Hi from Brittany, > > Mark, Thanks for the book info. > >> Robert Claiborne wrote a wonderful book called Our Marvelous >> Native Tongue. An excellent read. > Looks like the right book to read. Ordered today !! No, it doesn't, sorry. > > In return, as you appear to be interested in language origins, > may I point to an interesting site : > > http://www.proto-english.org/ > > Best Regards > > -Francis > "Sweeping across centuries and continents, Claiborne traces the history of English from its roots in the Danube Valley 8000 years ago to its status to day as native tongue of some 300 million people." Boy-Oh-Boy, talk about contentious; yet, this theory [the Danube valley] is presented as if it were fact. Nobody was talking English, or even anything that vaguely resembled it until about 2000 years ago in what is now Germany and Denmark. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nobody knows whether there really was a Proto-Indo-European language, and if so, where speakers of PIE lived (places suggested are the Indus valley, the Lithuanian marshes, and almost everywhere in between). Supposedly languages such as Sanskrit, Iranian, Bengali, English, German, Mitanni ...._______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
