I am never sarcastic. These functions can be written upon a meta-grammatical base that will work across languages. Rev already does this in limited ways. I find these limits absurd and backwards. Provencial even. It is long past time to ask the big questions of computing as a field. We follow as sheep, even when we are in charge of computing's future.
randall -----Original Message----- From: Dave Cragg <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 12:08 PM To: How to use Revolution <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Syllabic division of words On 21 Aug 2009, at 19:16, Randall Reetz wrote: > In addition to syllables, the system should be able to identify the > following textual chunks: > Characters > Phonems > Words > Parts of speech (phrases) > subject/object > Semantic roots > Sentences > Paragraphs > Sections > Volumes > Sets > Lists > Multidimentional arrays and nested tables > Unlimited nested and overlapping hyperlinks and transclussions > Tempo, pausing, pitch, volume, and percussive contrast > Ontological association network mapping between any chunk or chunk > type > > A simple, intuitive and robust interface and functional library to > address and effect these objects at every hierarchy of the > grammatical stack. Would this be for Polish or just Chinese? Sorry, but I can't work out if you're being serious or plain sarcastic like myself. Dave _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
