Since my last attempt made no impact, let me try putting it another way.
Revolution is like a Meccano set, which gives us pieces to make
whatever we want.
Most of us want extra nuts & bolts, longer braces, different angles
etc. to use in our own constructions.
You are asking for a fully operational machine to be included in the
basic set, and while there is no harm in asking, I find your
assumption that the advanced programming you want should be a vital
part of the environment to be naive and irritating.

However, I have stated my view point and I can see I am not going to
change yours, so we must agree to differ.

Regards,
Sarah



On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Randall Reetz<[email protected]> wrote:
> I have no sudden need for syllabic extraction.  It would be interesting, 
> following your logic to ask mid 18th century people if they had a need for a 
> personal computer or digital network.  Most people can't see past the widgets 
> in front of them.  Thank god for the weirdos like bill atkinson who work 
> towards what should be instead of what is. Do you really think there is 
> something with more potential impact on the future of computing then 
> effective meaning and natural language processing?  Do you imagine that I am 
> interested because I want to put dots between syllables in some wacky 
> personal dictionary re-invention waste-of-time hobby project in my 
> wood-paneled den (after my train set and battle of nomandy miniatures are 
> completed)?  Meaning processing has the potential to change everything.  If 
> the blocks we all have in our creative little hands can self assemble into 
> living breathing meaning machines (understanding not just executing 
> instructions), the whole world changes in ways previous technology and 
> infrastructure (plumbing, electricity, radio, rail, gas engines, powered 
> flight, even programmable computation) were but small hills in comparison.
>
> I have written simple stochastic parsing schemes that give me salient topic 
> information about any text I throw at them.  How much better my meaning 
> abstractions would be if I had access to more info than which strings sat 
> between space characters.
>
> Us old folk have a tendency to cast computing in binary absolutes, we look to 
> applications that give a single answer that can be cast easily as other 
> correct or the result of a bug.  But meaning is much fuzzier than 
> arithmetics.  We are intimate with this fuzziness... It is how our own 
> computers (brains) work.  Even so, we often reject computation that flirt and 
> struggles with truth at levels of complexity that real systems of any 
> interest exhibit.
>
> There is a whole world of possibilities beyond the absolutist horizon of our 
> own rather limited computational history.
>
> What would be as revolutionary today as hypercard was twenty some years ago?
>
> randall
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sarah Reichelt <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 4:16 PM
> To: How to use Revolution <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Syllabic division of words
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Randall Reetz<[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> This should be a standard function in any xtalk environment.
>
>
> This sort of comment comes up every now  then and always makes me
> laugh, no matter what feature it is referring to.
>
> Rev has enormous flexibility, so we all use it in very different ways.
> We all run into things that we want as part of the language, but you
> have to consider the return on investment for RunRev. I have been a
> member of this list for more years than I care to remember, and the
> HyperCard list before that, and this is the FIRST time I have ever
> come across anyone wanting syllabic division.
> There is no way that RunRev would see this as a worthwhile allocation
> of their resources and I for one would be extremely irritated if such
> a specialised request got their attention, when there are basic
> features that we all would use that still need to be implemented.
>
> So by all means ask for help on the list, but don't assume that
> something should be part of the language, just because you have a
> sudden need for it.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to