Randall Reetz wrote:

> Richard, the doc is obsolete, not the technology.  Follow
> the link provided.  A little reading will go a long way...

I did click the link. It took me only to the index of all documents for the current audio API:

<http://developer.apple.com/referencelibrary/MusicAudio/>

If you have a URL to a current implementation of this technology it would save some hunting.

If a current API for this is supported it would be an interesting read, but it's less important to me than the other technologies I'm researching so forgive me if I don't do the hunt myself.


> Why are you hell bent on destroying this much needed tech
> and me in the process?

Sorry if I ruffled feathers; not my intention. On the contrary, I agreed it was a way cool technology and offered an example of having seen it in action confirming its rather mind-blowing coolness.

If you had meant to provide a URL to a supported technology I can certainly understand a simple mistake, but if it's not supported it's of little long-term value.

And even if it were, as you noted this stuff isn't simple: Apple can provide an API for it, but what would a multi-platform tool like Rev do for Windows and Linux? I agree that it would be attractive, but I also agree it would be expensive.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Gaskin <ambassador at fourthworld.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 3:00 PM
> To: How to use Revolution <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
> Subject: Re: Syllabic division of words
>
> Randall Lee Reetz wrote:
>> Sorry, I have been spelling "phoneme" wrong.  Here is a link to the
>> apple tech to which I refereed:
>>
>> http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Mac/Sound/Sound-201.html
>
> ...which carries this warning:
>
>    Legacy Document
>
>    Important: The information in this document is obsolete
>    and should not be used for new development.
>
> Too bad.  I saw a video from an old WWDC (probably the same one
> in which they demoed the ill-fated HC3) in which the presenter
> had a text window with a slider control, and as he moved the
> slider the text would get more and more stripped down until it
> eventually showed only a sentence or two containing the most
> salient concepts.
>
> Nifty demo, but given the nuances of language and its continual
> evolution (we live in a world where "bad" means "good" and "sick"
> means "great") I can understand why it's been ditched.

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World
 Revolution training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
 Webzine for Rev developers: http://www.revjournal.com

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to