I think your question wasn't answered because it could be taken as rhetorical. I've come across other properties that I thought ought to be on the pallette but were not. I suppose at some point, someone in a room somewhere who makes a lot more money than me has to decide that there will only be one checkbox.
Now that you mention it, I think that is the answer to just about everything we encounter in the technological world that doesn't make sense to us at first, and upon further consideration, in a sudden epiphany, I believe at last I have the question to the answer to life the universe and everything! The question is... Which version of the universe is this? The answer of course, is 42. I thing we are on rev 3. They are still working some of the bugs out. Bob On Feb 5, 2010, at 7:35 AM, Mark Swindell wrote: > I asked this a couple of days ago and got no response so I thought I'd try > again. > > Why are locking size and position of an image inextricably linked? They seem > to me to be two separate entities. I know how to get around the situation > via script, but I don't know why there should be the inconvenience of having > to "get around" anything. Is there a good reason for this or is it just a > legacy reality that could be changed? Why not be able to drag an image > around whose size is constrained? > > Mark_______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
