Mark, very good question, I have no answer.
You can fake your locks with script if you want to decouple them. Cheers andre On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Mark Swindell <[email protected]> wrote: > I asked this a couple of days ago and got no response so I thought I'd try > again. > > Why are locking size and position of an image inextricably linked? They > seem to me to be two separate entities. I know how to get around the > situation via script, but I don't know why there should be the inconvenience > of having to "get around" anything. Is there a good reason for this or is > it just a legacy reality that could be changed? Why not be able to drag an > image around whose size is constrained? > > Mark_______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > -- http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
