Thanks Devin. I gave it some votes and added a plea for a change. Looks like the report has languished since 2005, v. 2.5. Perhaps others can add to it.
Mark On Feb 5, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Devin Asay wrote: > > On Feb 5, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Mark Swindell wrote: > >> I asked this a couple of days ago and got no response so I thought I'd try >> again. >> >> Why are locking size and position of an image inextricably linked? They >> seem to me to be two separate entities. I know how to get around the >> situation via script, but I don't know why there should be the inconvenience >> of having to "get around" anything. Is there a good reason for this or is >> it just a legacy reality that could be changed? Why not be able to drag an >> image around whose size is constrained? > > Mark, > > There is a long-standing enhancement request on this: > > http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=2242 > > Regards, > > Devin > > Devin Asay > Humanities Technology and Research Support Center > Brigham Young University > > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
