Peter, The current quoted-text convention might be useful if the developer is the one putting in the quotes. You use quotes instead of underscores. If you wanted a paragraph of musician names you add Madonna, Prince, "Bruce Springsteen" and Willie -- word 3 now refers to the Boss.
If you are munging other people's text then it becomes inconvenient. Mike --- On Tue, 5/4/10, Peter Brigham MD <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Peter Brigham MD <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Changing the Style of Words in Field And Quotation Marks? > To: "How to use Revolution" <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, May 4, 2010, 7:51 AM > Re: quoted text is treated as one > word, > > On May 3, 2010, at 7:26 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > > > Michael wrote: > >> Hi: I'm inclined to disagree. I would vote to keep > the current behavior. m > > > > I could easily have overlooked some simple reason to > retain it. How do you use it, generally? > > I'd like to know too, before adding a QC report. What is > the advantage that you see, apart from the nearly extinct HC > legacy issue? > > -- Peter > > Peter M. Brigham > [email protected] > http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig > > > > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage > your subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
