Keith Martin wrote: > I agree totally: a checkbox is meant to be a > control, not just a passive indicator.
Why not both? There are circumstances where disabling the control makes sense, yet even when disabled it should not lie: if the property it relates to is "on" the control should be set regardless of whether the user can interact with it at the time. Of course if the checkbox never becomes enabled and is used solely for display, any button type would be inappropriate as buttons are meant to be clicked. A status message, icon, or other non-interactive indicator would seem a better option for such cases. -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation Developer of WebMerge: Publish any database on any Web site ___________________________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com Tel: 323-225-3717 AIM: FourthWorldInc _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
