> I agree totally: a checkbox is meant to be acontrol, not just a passive indicator.
Why not both?[snip]
Of course if the checkbox never becomes enabled and is used solely for display, any button type would be inappropriate as buttons are meant to be clicked.
That's what I was thinking. If it is possible to use it in some circumstances then it is both a control and an indicator: a good use of the standard UI element.
A status message, icon, or other non-interactive indicator would seem a better option for such cases.
Agreed.
k _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
