Ops wrote: > the more Rev/Transcript is used, the more folks in that category > will appreciate and embrace the virtues of current Transcript.
If implented as Tuviah proposed it may actually have the opposite, beneficial effect: by allowing the world's most popular scripting language as a switchable option some folks might jump on board more quickly, and once they have the tool in hand sooner or later they'll take a look at Transcript and realize they've been working way too hard. :) > If this discussion is designed to increase the Rev > developer crowd by offering a syntax that is more prolific to the > developer community, then I think that other methods would be much more > wise to employ, such as fixing bugs and improving Rev PR in general... Agreed: bug fixes are far more useful for evangelizing right now than new features. The current excellent feature set just won a Mac Eddy, now it's time to make the experience of those features as smooth as silk. -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation ___________________________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
