Re: Transcript and/or ECMA - guess who started it?

[Ops]

Ah!  my bad and my apologies...I probably didn't read back far 
enough...it's just a "hot button" with me after having been involved 
with so many companies that just don't know how to *FOCUS*...and thus 
never do anything well, let alone excellent.  I must've "jumped in" to 
the middle of this and could not contain the *FOCUS* beast inside of me. 
 Cheers to all!

Opie

J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 2/18/04 12:48 PM, Ops wrote:

True enough Richard, but, I'm sure Rev resources are not unlimited, 
and if this is done at a long-term cost to the efficacy of the 
existing product, then I'm sure all would agree that those efforts 
would be "foot-shooting"...I for one, would like Rev to stay ontrack 
with the existing structure and not go off on tangents that would 
(IMHO) make the core product suffer.


I agree completely. The "cool factor" of alternate scripting languages 
should be a future enhancement. It would be nice to have, but I didn't 
mean to imply it should be done immediately. Just something to think 
about later on.

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution