True enough Richard, but, I'm sure Rev resources are not unlimited, and if this is done at a long-term cost to the efficacy of the existing product, then I'm sure all would agree that those efforts would be "foot-shooting"...I for one, would like Rev to stay ontrack with the existing structure and not go off on tangents that would (IMHO) make the core product suffer.
I agree completely. The "cool factor" of alternate scripting languages should be a future enhancement. It would be nice to have, but I didn't mean to imply it should be done immediately. Just something to think about later on.
-- Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED] HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
