Recently, "Judy Perry" wrote: >> wait 5 ticks with messages
> But, again, for those of my limited programming intelligence, what if I > don't want to allow the viewer/user to send any messages? Then you'll have to disable their email. :-) But if you're talking about Rev, the reason you'd include "with messages" is to allow other stuff to happen, like being able to interrupt your image display sequence. Let's say you wanted to give the user an "out" where they could simply show all the images and be done with it. Using "wait" by itself prevents Rev from doing anything until the script is done executing. But adding "with messages" allows other messages to be sent while the wait is taking place. Using, for example, another button script, you could interrupt the display script and quickly display all the remaining images. In your case, using "wait" by itself is probably fine. I was simply responding to Rob's comment about avoiding the wait command. In the past, I was also one of the proponents against using "wait" at all, but somewhere along the line, "with messages" was added which made for a whole new world of waiting. Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, Development & Design ----- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.tactilemedia.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
