Scott, Thank you for clarifying it. I can see how there is a usage for both wait and wait with messages. Obviously, I don't think I want waiting with messages for this case but can envision instances in which I might.
Judy On Wed, 5 May 2004, Scott Rossi wrote: > But if you're talking about Rev, the reason you'd include "with messages" is > to allow other stuff to happen, like being able to interrupt your image > display sequence. Let's say you wanted to give the user an "out" where they > could simply show all the images and be done with it. Using "wait" by > itself prevents Rev from doing anything until the script is done executing. > But adding "with messages" allows other messages to be sent while the wait > is taking place. Using, for example, another button script, you could > interrupt the display script and quickly display all the remaining images. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
