--- Scott Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But if you're talking about Rev, the reason > you'd include "with messages" is > to allow other stuff to happen, like being able > to interrupt your image > display sequence. Let's say you wanted to give > the user an "out" where they > could simply show all the images and be done > with it. Using "wait" by > itself prevents Rev from doing anything until > the script is done executing. > But adding "with messages" allows other > messages to be sent while the wait > is taking place. Using, for example, another > button script, you could > interrupt the display script and quickly > display all the remaining images. > > In your case, using "wait" by itself is > probably fine. I was simply > responding to Rob's comment about avoiding the > wait command. In the past, I > was also one of the proponents against using > "wait" at all, but somewhere > along the line, "with messages" was added which > made for a whole new world > of waiting.
-- thanks for the fine explanation ===== [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.erikhansen.org __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
