I think it's a mistake for Apple to limit the OS to their boxes. Why
NOT give Redmond a run for their money and open things up? Apple can
have the "SONY" quality box.
New opportunities to think different.
-JD
On Jun 6, 2005, at 4:34 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Chipp Walters wrote:
IMO, if they did offer an Intel OSX for *other* computers, they
*might* be able to give MS (and esp. the much delayed and
underpowered Longhorn) a run for their money.
Yes, that little company in Redmond does rather well without also
saddling themselves with manufacturing computers.
Indeed, the best computing value I've ever had relative to other
concurrent offerings was my Power Computing box.
<controversialNotion>
A lot of folks like to point to Apple's failed cloning experiment as
an example of why cloning must necessarily fail. But such a view
overlooks that Apple is the only example of such a failure.
I would argue that if Apple had entered cloning with anything more
than a half-baked, half-hearted effort (to to mention the iron fist
they wielded over cloners) we might once again see a 10% marketshare
for an Apple OS.
</controversialNotion>
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
___________________________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
