On Nov 16, 2005, at 9:43 PM, Alex Tweedly wrote:

I don't believe that a "Web-Photoshop" would need to satisfy the digital photography professional (mapping professionals aren't using Google Maps !). I think to get a commercially successful web- based photography editing app you need to satisfy 75% of the population - who start out with 3-6M-pixel photos compressed down to 1/2Mb JPEGs, not the pros using 32Mb RAW images,.


Is one implication that, in the brave new web-app world, professional- grade applications -- because nobody but professionals will be using them -- will get really, really expensive? Yes, many are now; but many aren't. Jarhead was edited, as I understand it, by whatshisname the great film editor using Final Cut Pro. Pro-level audio software, though not cheap, is within reach for an amateur. Will that stop being true? Don't like it.

Charles Hartman

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to