Mark Schonewille wrote: > Op 3-dec-2006, om 2:07 heeft Richard Gaskin het volgende geschreven: > >> Whiskey Tango Foxtrot? >> >> Without that, by what means can the IDE know to report that a >> script cannot be compiled due to a syntax error? > > It looks like the script editor checks the result and then emulates > the old scriptParsinError message.
It worked reliably for years, so why ditch it and put in all the extra work reproducing the same thing in script?
And how does that script work? Are there undocumented messages and/or functions at play?
I look forward to the explanation which will change my impression of this from "disturbing" to "brilliant" -- or simply putting back the tried-and-true token and moving on to truly important changes....
-- Richard Gaskin Managing Editor, revJournal _______________________________________________________ Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
