Thanks for the info. I am just of the opinion that the file functions in rev could possibly be more economical - it's as easy as that.
By Economical, do you mean a command for every variation? The problem with that is that the more definitions that are in the message path, the slower Rev gets. If Rev made up a specific function for everything, Rev might not perform as well, not to mention the cross-platform sync, documentation and bug issues.
I quite like it that Rev gives us the 'primitives' sometimes with these things where we might want to 'roll our own' and quite frankly, I look forward to writing efficient functions and handlers to do what I need with the data.
Once you get comfortable with Rev, you'll make up your own libraries for what you need to do that stock Rev can't.
-- stephen barncard s a n f r a n c i s c o - - - - - - - - - - - - _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
