Re: performnace of iBATIS

[DaqiQian2]

Sven,   thanks for your response. I did some preliminary test on iBATIS' performance. For JDBC (MySql 5.0), i recorded time from establishing connection, result set, and mapping the result to objects. For list of simple objects, it seems to me that iBATIS (no caching and lazyloading) is 3-5 times slower than using JDBC. Of course, i believe my xml mapping has room to improve.   The reason I asked is that I need some stats to persuade myself and coworkers to accept iBATIS as a data persistence tool for our relatively heavily loaded servers.   btw, we just pushed a project using iBATIS to QE. For that project, performance is not big issue.   Thanks, Tony