I have no specific feedback concerning this codec, I can only report that it seems to work in my XP setup. Doesn't it say anything more specific than that?
Still, I want to stress the benefits of rendering to still images and using something else to encode the video. Something like virtual dub or even some hideously expensive Adobe product. This way you can process the images further, if necessary, before destroying them with lossy compression. ;-) / Fredrik On 26 April 2010 21:46, Neil Cooke <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi List, > > Getting an "output" error message when I try to use this codec from the vid > compression list in XP. Works fine in Vista but my two XP machines cant get > to it. > > Any kind of fix appreciated. I'm just totally new at this end of things. > > Neil Cooke
