Thanks Freber
The error message reads: Output error, cannot write image
(Error:r3fileren:780) .... sorry for not including this in my previous post.
the benefits of rendering to still images
I hear what you and many others have recommended with thanks. And it makes
sense to me, no question about that.
However for this current project I simply need to go with what I know
because of time and I have never tried the still images approach.
The project is the stereo competition in the 3DWorld mag. Learning heaps. A
lot of fun.
Thanks again
Neil Cooke
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: IYUV Codec in RS V7 for XP
On second thought - I tested a few renders and it appears as if the
size is limited in this version. The maximum size I can render is
640x480. Perhaps Vista has a newer version of the codec that handles
larger frames?
/ Fredrik
On 26 April 2010 22:07, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
I have no specific feedback concerning this codec, I can only report
that it seems to work in my XP setup. Doesn't it say anything more
specific than that?
Still, I want to stress the benefits of rendering to still images and
using something else to encode the video. Something like virtual dub
or even some hideously expensive Adobe product. This way you can
process the images further, if necessary, before destroying them with
lossy compression. ;-)
/ Fredrik
On 26 April 2010 21:46, Neil Cooke <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi List,
Getting an "output" error message when I try to use this codec from the
vid
compression list in XP. Works fine in Vista but my two XP machines cant
get
to it.
Any kind of fix appreciated. I'm just totally new at this end of things.
Neil Cooke
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.814 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2835 - Release Date: 04/26/10
06:31:00
