On second thought - I tested a few renders and it appears as if the size is limited in this version. The maximum size I can render is 640x480. Perhaps Vista has a newer version of the codec that handles larger frames?
/ Fredrik On 26 April 2010 22:07, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > I have no specific feedback concerning this codec, I can only report > that it seems to work in my XP setup. Doesn't it say anything more > specific than that? > > Still, I want to stress the benefits of rendering to still images and > using something else to encode the video. Something like virtual dub > or even some hideously expensive Adobe product. This way you can > process the images further, if necessary, before destroying them with > lossy compression. ;-) > > / Fredrik > > > On 26 April 2010 21:46, Neil Cooke <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi List, >> >> Getting an "output" error message when I try to use this codec from the vid >> compression list in XP. Works fine in Vista but my two XP machines cant get >> to it. >> >> Any kind of fix appreciated. I'm just totally new at this end of things. >> >> Neil Cooke >
