On Thursday 10 February 2005 20:04, Al Viro wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 07:39:23PM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > > 3) I don't understand how vmlinux.lds.S is created... it's a symlink, but > > it's created nowhere after the patch - maybe I overlook something, maybe > > you didn't do "make clean" and retest.
> Not a symlink anymore. It's right there in the patch - Nice trick. In this case, it got lost in the version at that URL (I don't know whose is the fault). I triple-checked that the file is missing at that URL. Btw, did you also fix the typo I mentioned? -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
