On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 02:58:02PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I note that this patch assumes that
> uml-kill-some-useless-vmalloc-tlb-flushing.patch is applied.
>
> AFAIK that patch is still in limbo due to objections from Paolo. Can we
> sort that out please?
I did some testing to check that vmalloc is OK.
First, boot and do a kernel build on COWed devices, which uses vmalloc space
for the block bitmaps.
Second, modprobed all modules, and made sure that one of them actually worked.
Ran a kernel build to induce lots of context switches, made sure it still
worked.
It sure seems OK to me.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
