On Saturday 02 July 2005 02:06, Andrew Morton wrote: > Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Friday 01 July 2005 23:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well I can fix the reject if we decide that > uml-kill-some-useless-vmalloc-tlb-flushing.patch is not to be applied, but > it seems that there's no need. > > However, for now it seems that I can't reproduce anyway the iptables > > crash, and even Jeff did some testing... so it seems it's ok. > OK.. > Now what about uml-remove-winch-sem.patch? I have a "keep this in -mm" > sign next to it. Well, wait a bit for that... I'll be publishing that out in my patchset, so we'll get wider testing. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
