On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > What version was your friend running? > > Memory makes me think that we already addressed the overly-anxious default > action of mergetable? A quick search didn't net me a ticket for it, so maybe > that deficiency got lost in the wind...
ACCUMULO-952 ... seems that ticket should be marked as fixed in 1.4.3 > > > On 4/10/13 4:34 PM, David Medinets wrote: >> >> A friend of mine just ran 'mergetable -t <tablename>' and all splits >> disappeared ... just one tablet was left. So, if you try this you probably >> want to specify additional options. > >
