1.4.1 On Apr 10, 2013 5:17 PM, "Josh Elser" <[email protected]> wrote:
> What version was your friend running? > > Memory makes me think that we already addressed the overly-anxious default > action of mergetable? A quick search didn't net me a ticket for it, so > maybe that deficiency got lost in the wind... > > On 4/10/13 4:34 PM, David Medinets wrote: > >> A friend of mine just ran 'mergetable -t <tablename>' and all splits >> disappeared ... just one tablet was left. So, if you try this you probably >> want to specify additional options. >> > >
