Ahh, thanks for finding that and the merge, Keith.
On 04/10/2013 05:34 PM, Keith Turner wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote:
What version was your friend running?
Memory makes me think that we already addressed the overly-anxious default
action of mergetable? A quick search didn't net me a ticket for it, so maybe
that deficiency got lost in the wind...
ACCUMULO-952 ... seems that ticket should be marked as fixed in 1.4.3
On 4/10/13 4:34 PM, David Medinets wrote:
A friend of mine just ran 'mergetable -t <tablename>' and all splits
disappeared ... just one tablet was left. So, if you try this you probably
want to specify additional options.
