GitHub user rok added a comment to the discussion: A new home for pyarrow-stubs?

As a sprint at EuroPython @paddyroddy and I created a [draft for including 
@zen-xu's pyarrow-stubs with pyarrow](https://github.com/rok/arrow/pull/42) (as 
proposal nr 2 in 
https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/32609#issuecomment-2334113297). We used 
`ty` and included a CI job that checks for annotation issues (following 
[numpy's example](https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/16515)). 

If we decide to proceed with this we would of course need @zen-xu donating 
pyarrow-stubs first.

Things that come to mind after working on this:
* It would be nice to inline as much annotations as possible for 
maintainability.
* PR currently copies pyarrow-stubs verbatim, but we would probably want to 
remove docs from `pyi` files if possible.

GitHub link: 
https://github.com/apache/arrow/discussions/45919#discussioncomment-13912900

----
This is an automatically sent email for [email protected].
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: [email protected]

Reply via email to