GitHub user AlenkaF added a comment to the discussion: A new home for pyarrow-stubs?
I am not against inline annotations—in fact, I’ll support whatever decision @rok and @paddyroddy make on this. That said, I wanted to link to a comment from March this year that might be relevant or helpful: https://github.com/apache/arrow/discussions/45919#discussioncomment-12622499 > If there isn't a strong consensus on inline types, I'd probably recommend the > types be kept as stubs (with some tools like > [stubtest](https://mypy.readthedocs.io/en/stable/stubtest.html) to make sure > they're complete and in-sync). The reason is that if you change your mind, > it's easier to move from stubs to inline types, whereas removing inline types > will cause a lot of churn and merge conflicts. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/arrow/discussions/45919#discussioncomment-14071246 ---- This is an automatically sent email for user@arrow.apache.org. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: user-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org
