Branches are irrelevant to how the we allow the commits to get in. Branches are needed for more complex features that require a collaborate effort and/or prolonged development time. Does it make sense?
Cos On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 09:26AM, Jay Vyas wrote: > If we wanna do CTR ... > Can we just do it into master? > I realize it will break but that what CI is for. > > I wanna make sure we aren't just creating a backlog of unmerged branches. > > > On Dec 26, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 from me > > > >> On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> I've been reading this discussion on Ignite (incubating) dev@ list > >> http://s.apache.org/wPA and it clicked with the thread we were having in > >> the last few days around the community and development processes. > >> > >> What do you guys think if we'll try CTR model? Committers here went through > >> the process of gaining their karma and proved with their contributions that > >> they don't need peer-reviews for a lot of things that are coming into the > >> project on the daily basis. The RTC is especially annoying for trivial > >> changes > >> and is really making things slower than they could've been. > >> > >> So, what do you think guys? > >> > >> -- > >> Take care, > >> Cos > >> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622 > >> Cos' pubkey: http://people.apache.org/~cos/cos.asc > >> > >> ---- Wisdom of the hour ---- > >> > >> FORTUNE PROVIDES QUESTIONS FOR THE GREAT ANSWERS: #4 > >> A: Go west, young man, go west! > >> Q: What do wabbits do when they get tiwed of wunning awound? > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > - Andy > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > > (via Tom White)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
